LJUBLJANA CASE: The Sokol Association in Ljubljana, the capital of Carniola: Physical Education as a Means of Political Engagement in the 19th century?
![]() |
Picture 1: Comparison between the Turnvereins and Sokols establishment |
The Sokol movement The Sokol movement on the Slovenian territory was influenced by the Czech movement, especially by the Prague Sokol, founded in 1862 by Miroslav Tyrš. It is important to emphasise that gymnastics was not something new in Ljubljana. On the contrary! The very same year they also intended to establish a gymnastic association, independently of the events in Prague. The establishment of Južni Sokol On the 27th of July 1862, a call for the establishment of Južni Sokol was sent out. The establishment and drafting of the association's rules also raised the issue of the professional language. Furthermore, the preparatory committee was composed entirely of Slovenians, while the association was supposed to include Slovenians and Germans. Consequently, the gymnasts quickly split up, eventually forming two separate associations. Although both had the same purpose, the government approved the rules of the Turnverein almost immediately, whereas Sokol had to wait almost a year.
Submission of rules and the rejection of their application
Upon reviewing the request in February 1863, the head of the police department of Ljubljana concluded that it was signed by five young men who were supposedly members of an "ultra-national party". For them, this was an indication that the association had a political dimension under the guise of practicing gymnastics. The application was thus rejected by the government and Sokol soon submitted, revised rules, albeit unsuccessfully. After modifying them three times, they were finally approved by the government on 25th of September 1863 – oddly enough on the same day as those of the Laibacher Turnverein.
The main concern was not only the nationality of the members, but also the provision regarding the membership of students. As for the very purpose of the association, they objected that anyone could join, regardless of nationality, thus further emphasizing that they would not serve as a political association in disguise.
![]() |
Picture 2: Rules, submitted on the 21st of December 1862 |
![]() |
Picture 3: Rules approved on the 25th of September 1863 |
Interestingly, the Turnverein’s rules are almost the same as the ones Sokol had to correct. Its rules were actually based on the Vienna Turnverein which also had no problems with the said provision. The governments’ goal with this restriction was probably to prevent them from having direct contact with the youth.
![]() |
Picture 4: Rules of the Laibacher Turnvereins approved on 25. 9. 1863 |
The Sokol excess In the beginning, the two associations were on good terms, but tensions began to rise with the Prusso-Austrian War in 1866 when the wounded soldiers, seeking medical treatment, were coming to Ljubljana. Despite their willingness to assist the Turnverein, they were repeatedly turned away from doing so. All this led to an incident which would later cost them the entire association. Towards the end of July, a fight between the two rival associations broke out. The mayor of Ljubljana, E. H. Costa, a prominent member of Sokol, was also involved. Being blamed for the said event, Južni Sokol had to close its doors after almost four years. Having dismissed the association on the 1st of August 1867, it was clear that the government took advantage of the situation. Sadly, the dissolution was not the only consequence Slovenians had to face. The Germans primarily achieved two things. By taking away the town police, suspending the mayor of Ljubljana and the trial, they paralysed any active politics of the Slovenian party. On the other hand, they made it clear who the government was in favour of. Much of the political capital that Costa was now lost. Sokol has died, may Sokol live Not long after the infamous Sokol excess, at the start of 1868, the association Ljubljanski Sokol began its activities. The establishment itself took around a month which is considerably less than in 1863. But was this actually surprising? The reason could probably be attributed to the so-called liberal Associations' Act, which was passed on the 15th of November 1867. Although the name is in its own way deceiving, the act implemented the right of association and brought to life the constitutional right of assembly. In this regard, paragraphs 6 and 8 are of crucial importance.
![]() |
Picture 5: Associations’ act of 1867 (Gesetz über das Vereinsrecht), 15. november 1867 (freedom of assembly) |
![]() |
Picture 6: Rules approved on the 25th of September 1863 |
![]() |
Picture 7: Rules of Ljubljanski Sokol – January 1868 |
The first major appearance of the newly formed association was in 1868 at the tabor in Žalec, and the following year at the one in Vižmarje. In May of 1869, there was yet another infamous encounter between the two rival associations. When the Turnverein went on an excursion to the countryside they were forced out of Janče by the agitated farmers. Later in the evening, this escalated into a smaller conflict. Consequently, the members of Turnverein allegedly did not dare to set foot into the countryside in the near future, and Sokol couldn’t organize any trips for the whole summer, since the government turned down each of their requests, claiming they were threatening to disrupt the public order.
![]() |
Picture 8: Examples of government bans on organizing excursions |
Conclusion The Sokol Association was not just a gymnastics association. It played an important role in the co-shaping of politics in the second half of the 19th century, which is particularly evident in the case of the infamous Sokol excesses. From the very beginning, its activities were affected by obstacles from the authorities, who favoured the German associations. Despite the initial difficulties in establishing the association and its later dissolution, it managed to maintain its influence and popularity. At the turn of the century, the cultural struggle further exposed the political nature of the Sokol movement – political polarisation raised the question of whether the essence of the movement was "political apprenticeship" or "a training ground for young people for real life later on". This polarisation triggered two major turning points in the movement’s history: the founding of the Catholic-oriented gymnastics association Orel and the attempt to distance the movement from political issues at the turn of the 20th century.
By Teja Benčič
This contribution is part of the Ljubljana students' collective project The rights of association and assembly between assertion and resistance among Slovenes with an outlook to Spain in the long 19th century: villagers, workers, academics, lawyers, gymnasts, citizens at large (curated by Prof. dr. Katja Škrubej).
Bibliography:
Comments
Post a Comment